| Case No. | Case Caption | Case Status | Date
Accepted | Case Issue |
|
2019-0453
|
Malieka Evans
v.
Akron General Medical Center et al
|
OPEN
|
6/5/2019
| If no viable cause of action exists against an employee, such that an employee can
no longer be found liable for an alleged wrong, a plaintiff cannot maintain a cause
of action against an employer for negligent hiring, supervision, or retention |
|
2019-0425
|
Orange City Schools Board of Education, et al.
v.
Cuyahoga County Board of Revision, et al.
|
OPEN
(Held)
|
6/12/2019
| The Eighth District Court of Appeals and Board of Tax Appeals decisions are in direct conflict with this Court’s previous decisions. This Court should grant Appellant’s appeal so it can address whether the sale of a membership interest in a limited liability company constitutes the best evidence of value for real estate tax purposes. |
|
2019-0425
|
Orange City Schools Board of Education, et al.
v.
Cuyahoga County Board of Revision, et al.
|
OPEN
(Held)
|
6/12/2019
| The Ohio Board of Tax Appeals has issued multiple decisions on this issue. This Court should grant Appellant’s appeal so it can address these inconsistencies and set a uniform statewide standard. |
|
2019-0425
|
Orange City Schools Board of Education, et al.
v.
Cuyahoga County Board of Revision, et al.
|
OPEN
(Held)
|
6/12/2019
| This issues is of great importance to participants in Ohio’s real estate market. All taxpayers must be treated uniformly under Ohio’s Constitution. Additionally, decisions ignoring this Court’s prior precedent crate uncertainty in Ohio’s vibrant real estate market. This is both a substantial constitutional question and a question of great general and public interest. |
|
2019-0421
|
In the Matter of the Adoption of: M.M.F.
|
OPEN
|
5/29/2019
| PROPOSITION OF LAW NO. 1: By requiring that indigent persons receive appointed counsel
when termination of their parental rights is adjudicated in juvenile court, but not when
termination of their parental rights by adoption is adjudicated in probate court, the state
of Ohio denies adoption respondents equal protection of the laws.
|
|
2019-0421
|
In the Matter of the Adoption of: M.M.F.
|
OPEN
|
5/29/2019
| PROPOSITION OF LAW NO. 2: Denying appointed counsel to an indigent adoption
respondent unable to perform relevant and effective cross-examination, produce
disinterested witnesses and exhibits, and argue regarding existence and significance of a
zero child support order violates due process of law in the circumstances of this case.
|
|
2019-0420
|
In the Matter of the Adoption of: Y.E.F.
|
OPEN
|
5/29/2019
| PROPOSITION OF LAW NO. 1: By requiring that indigent persons receive appointed counsel
when termination of their parental rights is adjudicated in juvenile court, but not when
termination of their parental rights by adoption is adjudicated in probate court, the state
of Ohio denies adoption respondents equal protection of the laws.
|
|
2019-0420
|
In the Matter of the Adoption of: Y.E.F.
|
OPEN
|
5/29/2019
| PROPOSITION OF LAW NO. 2: Denying appointed counsel to an indigent adoption
respondent unable to perform relevant and effective cross-examination, produce
disinterested witnesses and exhibits, and argue regarding existence and significance of a
zero child support order violates due process of law in the circumstances of this case.
|
|
2019-0418
|
Litchfield Township Board of Trustees
v.
Forever Blueberry Barn, LLC
|
OPEN
|
5/29/2019
| Proposition of Law No. I:
Upon a property where grapes are cultivated, the owner’s use of a building upon said property must be should to be utilized primarily for the production of wine made from grapes and for the sale of wine produced therein, in order, pursuant to R.C. §519.21(A), for the use of the building to be exempt from zoning regulation.
|
|
2019-0416
|
Belinda J. Torres Friedenberg
v.
Keith A. Friedenberg, et al.
|
OPEN
|
5/29/2019
| Proposition of Law No. I:
A party’s request for custody does not constitute a complete abrogation of the physician-patient privilege under R.C. 3217.02(B) where the mental and physical health records do not relate to the party’s ability to parent.
|
|