|
|
In re Spott (1973), 34 Ohio St.2d 241;
In re Application of Davis (1974), 38 Ohio St.2d 273;
In re Application of Davis (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 371;
In re Application of Watson (1987), 31 Ohio St.3d 220;
In re Application of Corrigan (1989), 47 Ohio St.3d 32;
In re Application of Stineman (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 88;
In re Application of Mort (1990), 53 Ohio St.3d 260;
In re Application of Carroll (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 60;
In re Application of Palmer (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 74;
In re Application of Weems (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 212;
In re Application of Lammers (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 322;
In re Application of Simmons (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 1;
In re Application of Carr-Williams (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 752;
In re Application of Hatton (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 440;
In re Application of Bower (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 429;
In re Application of Holzhauser (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 43;
In re Application of Grossman (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 372;
In re Application of Piro (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 400;
In re Application of Chapman (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 17;
In re Application of Salisbury (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 403;
In re Application of Samuels (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 537;
In re Application of Wang (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 677;
In re Application of Ireland-Phillips (1995), 71 Ohio St.3d 609;
In re Application of Parry (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 75;
In re Application of Kapel (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 532;
In re Application of McCarthy (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 542;
In re Application of Keita (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 46;
In re Application of White (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 1514;
In re Application of Holzhauser (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 1518;
In re Application of Nemec (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 52;
In re Application of Mitchell (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d, 153;
In re Application of Rudolph (1997),79 Ohio St.3d 157;
In re Application of Kantor (1997),79 Ohio St.3d 167;
In re Application of Nerren (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 322;
In re Application of Hayes (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 88;
In re Application of Sabino (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 98;
In re Application of Stage (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 554;
In re Application of Calim (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 96;
In re Application of Fletcher (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 191;
In re Application of Kemp (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 274;
In re Application of Panepinto (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 395;
In re Application of Cureton (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 53;
In re Application of Kapel (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 122;
In re Application of VanDenBossche (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 158;
In re Applicationof Wylie (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 471;
In re Application of Barilatz (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 396;
In re Application of Bland (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d, 414;
In re Application of Valencia (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 542
In re Application of Lecointe (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 141;
In re Application of Wessel (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 212;
In re Application of Williams (2002), 95 Ohio St.3d 107;
In re Application of John Doe (2002), 95 Ohio St.3d 1444;
In re Application of John Doe II (2002), 96 Ohio St.3d 158;
In re Application of Hampton (2003), 99 Ohio St.3d 306;
In re Application of Singh (2003), 101 Ohio St.3d 8;
In re Application of Harris (2004), 101 Ohio St.3d 268;
In re Application of Cvammen (2004), 102 Ohio St.3d 13;
In re Application of Manayan (2004), 102 Ohio St.3d 109;
In re Application of Bagne (2004), 102 Ohio St.3d 182;
In re Application of Aboyade (2004), 103 Ohio St.3d 318;
In re Application of Mefford (2004), 104 Ohio St.3d 324;
In re Application of Dickens (2005), 106 Ohio St.3d 128;
In re Application of Olterman (2005), 106 Ohio St.3d 383;
In re Application of Dabney (2005), 107 Ohio St.3d 40;
In re Application of Ralls (2006), 109 Ohio St.3d 487;
In re Application of Conrad (2006), 110 Ohio St.3d 302;
In re Application of Ford (2006), 110 Ohio St.3d 503;
In re Application of Howard (2006), 111 Ohio St.3d 220;
In re Application of Yazdian (2006), 112 Ohio St.3d 409;
In re Application of Stewart (2006), 112 Ohio St.3d 415;
In re Application of Bell (2007), 112 Ohio St.3d 530.