Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 211 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Smith 17 MA 0174Postrelease control; the trial court’s use of the words “up to” did not render the defendant’s postrelease control term advisement insufficient.WaiteMahoning 11/9/2018 11/13/2018 2018-Ohio-4562
State v. Lucicosky 17 MA 0141R.C. 2929.14(C)(4); consecutive sentences; no facts within the record to support trial court’s finding of a criminal history or that defendant was on bond while act committed.WaiteMahoning 11/9/2018 11/13/2018 2018-Ohio-4563
State v. Rudai 18 BE 0002Public trial; jury trial; strict complianceBartlettBelmont 11/5/2018 11/5/2018 2018-Ohio-4464
State v. Gheen 17 BE 0023guilty plea to one count of burglary; strict compliance with Crim.R. 11(C)(2) required; advisement of “speedy and public” trial is not advisement of “jury” trial; trial court did not coerce appellant into confessing to another crimeDonofrioBelmont 11/2/2018 11/5/2018 2018-Ohio-4465
In re C.A.C.J. 18 BE 0010R.C. 3109.04(E); change of circumstances; best interest; R.C. 3109.04(F)(1); R.C. 3109.04(F)(3); the court shall not give preference to a parent because of that parent's financial status or condition.WaiteBelmont 11/2/2018 11/7/2018 2018-Ohio-4501
State v. Dotson 16 MA 0105application to reopenPer CuriamMahoning 10/31/2018 11/5/2018 2018-Ohio-4466
Pfalzgraf v. Miley 16 MO 0005; 16 MO 0006motion to certify untimelyPer CuriamMonroe 10/29/2018 10/30/2018 2018-Ohio-4392
State v. Panezich 17 MA 0087Application for reopen was timely, but did not present genuine issue of ineffectiveness of appellate counsel.Per CuriamMahoning 10/25/2018 11/1/2018 2018-Ohio-4411
Staffrey v. D'Apolito 18 MA 0038Procedendo; rape; R.C. 2907.02(A)(2); attempted aggravated murder; R.C. 2923.02(A); R.C. 2903.01(A); kidnapping; R.C. 2905.01(A)(4); aggravated burglary; R.C. 2911.11(A)(3); petition for postconviction relief; R.C. 2953.21; moot; duty already performed.Per CuriamMahoning 10/12/2018 10/16/2018 2018-Ohio-4193
Neuhart v. Transatlantic Energy Corp. 17 NO 0449Pugh clause; when an amendment letter provided that any undrilled acreage would be released if three wells were not drilled by the end of the primary term the landowner need not act within a statute of limitations because the undrilled acreage automatically reverted to them by operation of law at the end of the primary term; paying quantities; temporary cessation of production; capital expenses not included in a paying quantities analysis; expenses unrelated to the production of oil and gas not included in paying quantities analysis.WaiteNoble 10/5/2018 10/10/2018 2018-Ohio-4099