Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 397 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Kuhel 17AP-774No expungement of criminal charges dismissed in municipal court and not bound over but later subject to direct indictment.TyackFranklin 12/11/2018 12/11/2018 2018-Ohio-4963
State v. Watson 17AP-834Appellant's felonious assault conviction was supported by sufficient evidence. Viewed in a light most favorable to the state, the evidence demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant knowingly caused serious physical harm to the victim when, without any provocation or warning to the victim, he struck the victim with a strong closed fist punch to the side of the victim's head. Judgment affirmed.Luper SchusterFranklin 12/11/2018 12/11/2018 2018-Ohio-4964
Zarbana Indus., Inc. v. Hayes 18AP-104Appellant failed to demonstrate the court of common pleas erred in finding it lacked jurisdiction to address appellant's declaratory judgment action contending the Industrial Commission lacked authority to reject its VSSR settlement agreement under R.C. Chapter 4121 and Ohio Admin.Code 4121-3-20(F). Judgment affirmed.SadlerFranklin 12/11/2018 12/11/2018 2018-Ohio-4965
State v. Wright 18AP-303Judgment affirmed. Appellant is not subject to post-release control in Franklin County. As such, his assignments of error are overruled.HortonFranklin 12/11/2018 12/11/2018 2018-Ohio-4966
State v. Jennings 18AP-338The trial court did not err in denying Jennings’ motion to terminate commitment.Luper SchusterFranklin 12/11/2018 12/11/2018 2018-Ohio-4967
Wood v. Div. of Oil & Gas Resources Mgt. 18AP-470Court of Claims lacked subject matter jurisdiction over oil and gas well operator's claim for declaratory judgment.TyackFranklin 12/11/2018 12/11/2018 2018-Ohio-4968
Kanu v. Univ. of Cincinnati 18AP-517The trial court did not err in granting appellee's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6). Judgment affirmed.Luper SchusterFranklin 12/11/2018 12/11/2018 2018-Ohio-4969
State v. Guy 17AP-281Convictions for heroin trafficking, heroin possession, and kidnapping were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence where detective's eyewitness testimony plus other evidence established appellant was the individual who committed the offenses. Although appellant's alibi witnesses provided contrary testimony regarding appellant's whereabouts at the time of some of the offenses, the jury did not clearly lose its way in finding appellant guilty.DorrianFranklin 12/6/2018 12/6/2018 2018-Ohio-4835
State v. Guy 17AP-322Convictions for heroin trafficking, heroin possession, and kidnapping were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence where detective's eyewitness testimony plus other evidence established appellant was the individual who committed the offenses. Although appellant's alibi witnesses provided contrary testimony regarding appellant's whereabouts at the time of some of the offenses, the jury did not clearly lose its way in finding appellant guilty.DorrianFranklin 12/6/2018 12/6/2018 2018-Ohio-4836
Huntington Natl. Bank v. Haehn 17AP-342The trial court did not err in vacating an interlocutory order, extending a deadline for the submittal of a proposed judgment entry, or granting the lender judgment in its foreclosure action.KlattFranklin 12/6/2018 12/6/2018 2018-Ohio-4837
12345678910...>>