Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Year Decided?
County:   What is County?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 448 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
07/22/2016 Case Announcements  Motion and procedural rulings-Disciplinary cases.   7/22/2016 7/22/2016 2016-Ohio-5047
State ex rel. School Choice Ohio, Inc. v. Cincinnati Pub. School Dist. (Slip Opinion) 2014-0749Public records-R.C. 149.43-Requestor has clear legal right to access personally identifiable information of school district's students whose parents had consented to release of the information-Requestor failed to establish clear legal right to compel district to amend its student-information policy-Writ of mandamus granted in part and denied in part.Lanzinger, J.Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5026 7/21/2016 7/21/2016 2016-Ohio-5026
Onderko v. Sierra Lobo, Inc. (Slip Opinion) 2014-1881 and 2014-1962Workers' compensation-R.C. 4123.90-Action for retaliatory discharge-Prima facie case for retaliatory discharge does not include proof that plaintiff suffered workplace injury.O'Neill, J.Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5027 7/21/2016 7/21/2016 2016-Ohio-5027
07/21/2016 Case Announcements  Merit decisions with opinions.   7/21/2016 7/21/2016 2016-Ohio-5039
State ex rel. Aaron's, Inc. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp. (Slip Opinion) 2014-1641Workers' compensation-Ohio Adm.Code 4123-17-17(C)-Bureau of Workers' Compensation did not abuse discretion when it applied audit adjustment to the 24 months prior to the current payroll where substantial misclassifications occurred over a significant period of time and resulted in considerable underpayment of premiums to state fund.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5011 7/20/2016 7/20/2016 2016-Ohio-5011
250 Shoup Mill, L.L.C. v. Testa (Slip Opinion) 2015-0340Taxation-Real property-"Public schoolhouse" exemption-Former R.C. 5709.07(A)(1)-Exclusive-charitable-use exemption-R.C. 5709.12(B) and 5709.121-Taxpayer-lessor cannot claim vicarious exemption based on nature of activities of lessee community school-Record shows evidence of view to profit in form of surpluses realized through leases-Denial of claims for exemption affirmed.O'Neill, J.Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5012 7/20/2016 7/20/2016 2016-Ohio-5012
In re Resignation of Bodor 2016-0886Attorneys at law-Resignation with disciplinary action pending-Gov.Bar R. VI(7)(C).   7/20/2016 7/20/2016 2016-Ohio-5020
07/20/2016 Case Announcements  Merit decisions with opinions-Motion and procedural rulings-Miscellaneous dismissals-Disciplinary cases-Mediation matters.   7/20/2016 7/20/2016 2016-Ohio-5021
State ex rel. Maddox v. Lincoln Hts. (Slip Opinion) 2014-1267Mandamus-Original action-Class action-Mandamus cases may be brought as class actions in certain circumstances-Article IV, Section 2(B)(1) does not allow this court to approve money settlements in original action-Case returned to mediation.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5001 7/19/2016 7/19/2016 2016-Ohio-5001
Morris v. Morris (Slip Opinion) 2014-0688Divorce-Modification of spousal support-Continuing jurisdiction-R.C. 3105.18(E)-A trial court does not have jurisdiction under Civ.R. 60(B) to vacate or modify an award of spousal support in a decree of divorce or dissolution when decree does not contain reservation of jurisdiction to modify award-If parties' separation agreement, incorporated into a decree of dissolution, reserves jurisdiction to modify, a party is limited to seeking relief from judgment under Civ.R. 60(B)(1), (2), or (3) and may not seek relief under Civ.R. 60(B)(4) or (5)-Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.Kennedy, J.Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5002 7/19/2016 7/19/2016 2016-Ohio-5002